Because if he is legitimate, many so-called hunters will have to admit it is an act of skill that accomplished this feat. I don't know if Mitch's deer is fake or not, but I know why there is all this controversy around his deer. My understanding is that Mitch was asked to x-ray the deer, which as a former B&C scorer he had never seen done, was insulted, and refused to submit. He is one of many who have declined much more important recognition than that of the highest scoring typical whitetail. Under the circumstances, however, the Academy can only state that the presentation of the prize cannot take place.' The fact that he has declined this distinction does not in the least modify the validity of the award. It will be recalled that the laureate has made it known that he did not wish to accept the prize. 'This year the Nobel Prize in Literature has been granted by the Swedish Academy to the French writer Jean-Paul Sartre for his work which, rich in ideas and filled with the spirit of freedom and the quest for truth, has exerted a far-reaching influence on our age. In 1964, Jean-Paul Sartre refused to accept the Nobel Prize in Literature: The idea that because someone does not accept acclaim from an organization-especially one that he has had major issues with in the past, is equally absurd. That doesn't mean the buck is real, but it sure as heck means that nobody has any hard evidence that it isn't. Droopy ears, burrs too far apart, bondo.none of it proves anything. Virtually all the evidence about Mitch's fakery is of the same type.

Milo hanson buck